Bug#667110: basic256: ftbfs with GCC-4.7

2012-04-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:44:52 -0400, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: > > I've rescheduled it to 15-day now, just in case some unexpected > > happens to your plans. > As should soon apear in the bug log, basic256 0.9.6.69a-1 fixing this > bug has just been uploaded. I'm not sure if you need to cancel your NMU

Bug#667110: basic256: ftbfs with GCC-4.7

2012-04-27 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
Hi Gregor, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:02:37AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > I've rescheduled it to 15-day now, just in case some unexpected > happens to your plans. As should soon apear in the bug log, basic256 0.9.6.69a-1 fixing this bug has just been uploaded. I'm not sure if you need to canc

Bug#667110: basic256: ftbfs with GCC-4.7

2012-04-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
tag 667110 patch thanks Matthias Klose (03/04/2012): > Package: basic256 > Version: 0.9.6.66-1.1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid wheezy > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 Here's a patch to fix this FTBFS. No intent to NMU. Mraw, KiBi. diff -Nru basic256-0.9.6.66/deb