Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/06/2012 04:25 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: for (o-)s-p-u requests: please get the fix in unstable/testing first, as usual. The bug fix for SKS's peering (#667695) has propagated safely to testing. This is an standards-compliance interoperability fix for deployed sks services, so that they

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:01 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: The bug fix for SKS's peering (#667695) has propagated safely to testing. This is an standards-compliance interoperability fix for deployed sks services, so that they can function with peers who have adopted the current

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/23/2012 02:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Assuming that's attached as in attached to my earlier mail of the 5th, please go ahead; thanks. thanks. It's uploaded now, please let me know if you need anything else on this. Regards, --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:41 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 04/23/2012 02:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Assuming that's attached as in attached to my earlier mail of the 5th, please go ahead; thanks. thanks. It's uploaded now, please let me know if you need anything else on this.

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-13 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Daniel Am 06.04.2012 16:40, schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor: On 04/06/2012 04:25 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: for (o-)s-p-u requests: please get the fix in unstable/testing first, as usual. Right, that's reasonable. Christoph, Fabio, i'm going to NMU this to DELAYED/5. I'm doing the NMU

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-06 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 04/06/2012 04:25 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: for (o-)s-p-u requests: please get the fix in unstable/testing first, as usual. Right, that's reasonable. Christoph, Fabio, i'm going to NMU this to DELAYED/5. I'm doing the NMU since this is currently causing debian-backed sks instances to

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net (05/04/2012): I recommend including this fix in the next squeeze point release if it's ok with the release team and the sks maintainers. A proposed debdiff is attached; i'm running the resulting package in production on keys.mayfirst.org, and it

Bug#667695: fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
http://bugs.debian.org/667695 means that squeeze SKS servers currently don't synchronize well with their peers, especially with their peers that have adopted reverse HTTP proxies as a mechanism for high availability (i.e. the peers that are more likely to actually get key updates). The fix to