found 672034 widelands/1:17~rc2-3 thanks On 10/05/12 at 07:16 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > Hello, > > It seems to me that the FTBFS comes from the fact that you used > gcc-4.7 to build the package. If so, I'm kinda doubting the need for a > tag wheezy since gcc-4.7 is not part of wheezy.
Hi, "Tags: wheezy sid" really means "Tags: does not affect stable" (unfortunately, there's no such tag). Tagging "sid" only is dangerous, since this bug will affect wheezy as soon as GCC 4.7 will migrate to wheezy. So we would need to make sure that tags are updated accordingly. > This package being part of various transitions and building fine with > gcc-4.6, I was wondering if it would be possible to (temporarly?) > lowering the bug severity to allow its migration to testing, and the > completion of the libboost transition, amongst others. That decision would need to be taken by the release team. However, an easier solution is to mark that bug as affecting the testing version as well (since the migration criteria is "no new RC bugs"). I've just done that (I did not check that the testing package also fails to build with 4.7, but it seems to be a reasonable bet). Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
