Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-13 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:00:50PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Peterm So the bad news is that the build daemons got in a mess. The good news is that at least one FTP person thinks this will clear in about 24 hours and then the build

Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-11 Thread Nicholas Bamber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Peterm So the bad news is that the build daemons got in a mess. The good news is that at least one FTP person thinks this will clear in about 24 hours and then the build daemons will start building gforth. If that fails I guess you'll have

Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-11 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 07.09.2012 23:36, schrieb Nicholas Bamber: Peter, If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get this into wheezy. I probably won't get round to until later next week which gives the others a chance if they have more time. By the way I didn't get the email which is I guess

Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-10 Thread Nicholas Bamber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Peter, I started looking at gforth again. I'll let you know. On 07/09/12 22:45, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Peter, If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get this into

Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-07 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Peter, If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get this into wheezy. I probably won't get round to until later next week which gives the others a chance if they have more time. By the way I didn't get the email which is I guess another thing I'll have to look at. -- To

Bug#672616: gforth

2012-09-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:36:04PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Peter, If noone else does I will certainly endeavour to get this into wheezy. I probably won't get round to until later next week which gives the others a chance if they have more time. By the way I didn't get the email