Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > > > --On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Upstream (Howard Chu, thanks!) has committed and alternate fix [1]
> > > > >> [2].
> > > > >> Please consider back-porting it to Debian instead of using my patch.
This is f
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:57 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > > 2013/2/7 Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> > > > --On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> Upstream (Howa
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:57 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > 2013/2/7 Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> > > --On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
> > > wrote:
> > >> Upstream (Howard Chu, thanks!) has committed and alte
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 19:57 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 2013/2/7 Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> > --On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
> > wrote:
> >> Upstream (Howard Chu, thanks!) has committed and alternate fix [1] [2].
> >> Please consider back-porting it to Debian instead o
2013/2/7 Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> --On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
> wrote:
>
>> tags 673038 + patch fixed-upstream
>> thanks
...
>> Upstream (Howard Chu, thanks!) has committed and alternate fix [1] [2].
>> Please consider back-porting it to Debian instead of using my p
--On Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:45 PM +0100 Bálint Réczey
wrote:
tags 673038 + patch fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi All,
2013/1/28 Bálint Réczey :
...
I think we're all in agreement that the code should be fixed. Please
help to do that, if you can.
Upstream has rejected the proposed fix.
Si
tags 673038 + patch fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi All,
2013/1/28 Bálint Réczey :
...
>>
>> I think we're all in agreement that the code should be fixed. Please
>> help to do that, if you can.
> Upstream has rejected the proposed fix.
> Since it seems I'm not familiar enough with upstream's plans and
tags 673038 - patch
thanks
2013/1/27 Ben Hutchings :
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 23:45 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> 2013/1/26 Ben Hutchings :
>> > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> >> tags 673038 patch upstream - moreinfo
>> >> thanks
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>>
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 23:45 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> 2013/1/26 Ben Hutchings :
> > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >> tags 673038 patch upstream - moreinfo
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Upstream seems to know about the problem and I provided a fix f
Hi Ben,
2013/1/26 Ben Hutchings :
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> tags 673038 patch upstream - moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Upstream seems to know about the problem and I provided a fix for them
>> with a documentation update.
>> Slapcat's exit code is 1 in case
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 00:08 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> tags 673038 patch upstream - moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Upstream seems to know about the problem and I provided a fix for them
> with a documentation update.
> Slapcat's exit code is 1 in case of missing entries thus an
> unsuccessful b
tags 673038 patch upstream - moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Upstream seems to know about the problem and I provided a fix for them
with a documentation update.
Slapcat's exit code is 1 in case of missing entries thus an
unsuccessful backup attempt can be detected.
Since there is also a helper script for ret
forwarded 673038 techni...@openldap.org
thanks
Hi,
I have forwarded the problem to techni...@openldap.org but it has not
yet appeared in the list archive.
It worth noting that there exists a script [1] in ldap-git-backup which
can be used for backing up LDAP databases more reliably.
Cheers,
Bal
13 matches
Mail list logo
