On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:42:46 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote:
> Thanks for you help.
You're welcome!
> I noticed I forgot to push some of my changes in the git
> repository last time. Everything is now up-to-date and I have added your
> changes as well.
Excellent, thanks.
Cheers,
gregor
--
Hi Gregor,
Thanks for you help. I noticed I forgot to push some of my changes in the git
repository last time. Everything is now up-to-date and I have added your
changes as well.
Regards,
--
Franck Joncourt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le 06/05/2013 22:09, gregor herrmann a écrit :
On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:19:08 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Still reproducibl ein the sequence
setup squeeze
install psad/squeeze
remove psad (on't purge!)
distupgrade to wheezy
install psad/wheezy
Oh noes, this bug again!
:)
On Wed, 01 May
On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:19:08 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Still reproducibl ein the sequence
>
> setup squeeze
> install psad/squeeze
> remove psad (on't purge!)
> distupgrade to wheezy
> install psad/wheezy
Oh noes, this bug again!
On Wed, 01 May 2013 22:24:57 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote
I need to remember exactly what we have done with grego last time. There were
at least two updates to try to fix this issue. It should not be that
complicated to fix since you have tracked down the package state which prevents
the package from upgrading smoothly.
Thanks for your feedback.
Rega
Followup-For: Bug #675231
Still reproducibl ein the sequence
setup squeeze
install psad/squeeze
remove psad (on't purge!)
distupgrade to wheezy
install psad/wheezy
Andreas
psad_2.2-3.1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Le 30/05/2012 18:25, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails.
But this is not the r
Package: psad
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no us
8 matches
Mail list logo