I'd like to help, am in the source already figuring out why it's not
working for us.
Mark
Hi Prach, Ansgar,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:58:38PM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
larger changes. Please note that Debian is also upstream for this
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Ryan Kavanagh r...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Prach, Ansgar,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 09:58:38PM +0700, Prach Pongpanich wrote:
I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
Hi Ansgar,
I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not do
larger changes. Please note that Debian is also upstream for this
package. There are some downstream patches that still need to be
integrated
Control: noowner -1
Control: retitle -1 RFA: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing
Reverting to RFA as I haven't heard anything for almost a year.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
As I spend most of my Debian-time with maintaining my other packages or
non-packaging work, I request an adopter for the at package.
I am willing to continue to co-maintain the package and look after
urgent issues should there be one (eg. FTBFS bugs), but will not
6 matches
Mail list logo
