On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:34:47 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 13:47 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > Does the current kernel in unstable (linux-image-3.2.0-4-486,
> > > > > version 3.2.35-2) still have this problem?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the input. I'm showing 3.
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 13:47 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
[...]
> > > > Does the current kernel in unstable (linux-image-3.2.0-4-486,
> > > > version 3.2.35-2) still have this problem?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the input. I'm showing 3.2.0-4-486, version 3.2.32-1 as
> > > being installed, and not as you s
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:33:32 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:47 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> [...]
> > I've recently upgraded from Squeeze to Wheezy on two Motion
> > Computing M1400 computers. The upgrade seems g
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:13:37 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 13:06 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:33:32 +
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> > >
> > > Sorry for the delayed reply.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:47 -0
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 13:06 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:33:32 +
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed reply.
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:47 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I've recently upgraded from Squeeze t
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Sorry for the delayed reply.
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 09:47 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
[...]
> I've recently upgraded from Squeeze to Wheezy on two Motion Computing M1400
> computers. The upgrade seems generally OK and I am still able to load Linux
> 2.6.32-5-486.
>
> However
6 matches
Mail list logo