On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Version: 3.9-1
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:19:56AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > It still does with 3.2 in stable, but not with 3.9 in testing.
>
> Closing with that version, then.
No such version (3.9-1) was uploaded
It still does with 3.2 in stable, but not with 3.9 in testing.
Martin-Éric
2013/7/12 Moritz Muehlenhoff
> reassign 677655 src:linux
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:48:45AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> > > Yup, this issue returns every now and then o
reassign 677655 src:linux
thanks
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 03:48:45AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
> > Yup, this issue returns every now and then on the exact same host
> > (which was recently migrated from Ubuntu to Debian, now that Ubuntu
> > stopped supporting anyt
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Yup, this issue returns every now and then on the exact same host
> (which was recently migrated from Ubuntu to Debian, now that Ubuntu
> stopped supporting anything older than non-PAE 686 hardware), whenever
> someone touches the inode code again. The nice thing, this
2012/6/16 Ben Hutchings :
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 22:37 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> 2012/6/15 Jonathan Nieder :
>> > Hi Martin-Éric,
>> >
>> > Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm not sure if it's too early to report on kernel 3.4 or not, but
>> >> here it goes:
>> >
2012/6/16 Jonathan Nieder :
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>> By the way, searching for that particular address yields the following
>> interesting result. (Nothing else recent, alas.)
>
> Better link:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Yup, this issue returns every now and then o
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 21:23 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> > By the way, searching for that particular address yields the following
> > interesting result. (Nothing else recent, alas.)
>
> Better link:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
Oohkay,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> By the way, searching for that particular address yields the following
> interesting result. (Nothing else recent, alas.)
Better link:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 22:37 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> Here's the dmesg output at bootup, right after the first few oopses
>> have started to appear.
>
> The kernel is trying to free an inode and using an ACL pointer that
> should presumably be 0x (special v
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 22:37 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> 2012/6/15 Jonathan Nieder :
> > Hi Martin-Éric,
> >
> > Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure if it's too early to report on kernel 3.4 or not, but
> >> here it goes:
> >
> > Any package uploaded to the archi
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Here's the dmesg output at bootup, right after the first few oopses
> have started to appear.
Thanks, nice and quick.
Let's see:
[...]
> <6>[ 28.167997] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
> <6>[ 28.721401] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
> <1>[ 2
Hi Jonathan,
2012/6/15 Jonathan Nieder :
> Hi Martin-Éric,
>
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if it's too early to report on kernel 3.4 or not, but
>> here it goes:
>
> Any package uploaded to the archive is open for bug reports. :)
>
> Could you send the full "oops" trace, starting a
Hi Martin-Éric,
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's too early to report on kernel 3.4 or not, but
> here it goes:
Any package uploaded to the archive is open for bug reports. :)
[...]
> ** Kernel log:
> [ 29.054891] DR0: DR1: DR2: DR3:
> [ 29
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.4.1-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
I'm not sure if it's too early to report on kernel 3.4 or not, but here it
goes: dmesg keeps on reporting spurious kernel oppses involving inode
destructions, as seen below, whenever running kernel 3.4-trunk.
-- Package-specifi
14 matches
Mail list logo