Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-07-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le lundi 16 juillet 2012 à 23:16 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : The attached patch has been uploaded to Ubuntu quantal to add multiarch support for libbonobo. As Goswin notes, there is still a fair amount of binary-only 32-bit software using libbonobo; so despite the fact that this lib

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-07-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #68 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: quantal ubuntu-patch Hi there, The attached patch has been uploaded to Ubuntu quantal to add multiarch support for libbonobo. As Goswin notes, there is still a fair amount of binary-only

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 17.06.2012 01:39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 17.06.2012 00:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: But, to get rid of ia32-libs, we don't need to convert libbonobo to ma,

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Severity: normal Hello: Please make this package compatible with multiarch, as described at http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation. More info: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/MultiArch Thanks, Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 16.06.2012 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Severity: normal Hello: Please make this package compatible with multiarch, as described at http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation. I'd rather see us get rid of this package then invest time

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 16.06.2012 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Severity: normal Hello: Please make this package compatible with multiarch, as described at http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation. I'd rather see us

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 16.06.2012 22:19, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 16.06.2012 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Severity: normal Hello: Please make this package compatible with multiarch, as described at

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 16.06.2012 22:19, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 16.06.2012 20:42, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Package: libbonobo Version: 2.24.3-1 Severity: normal Hello: Please make this package compatible with

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 17.06.2012 00:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: But, to get rid of ia32-libs, we don't need to convert libbonobo to ma, right? Or is there another pressing need to convert libbonobo? We do need libbonobo:i386 for ia32-libs to keep 32bit software,

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 17.06.2012 00:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: But, to get rid of ia32-libs, we don't need to convert libbonobo to ma, right? Or is there another pressing need to convert libbonobo? We do need libbonobo:i386

Bug#677778: libbonobo: Please add multiarch support

2012-06-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 17.06.2012 01:39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: On 17.06.2012 00:25, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org writes: But, to get rid of ia32-libs, we don't need to convert libbonobo to ma, right? Or is there another pressing need