On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:48:56PM +0400, Michael Tokarev
wrote:
> I mean, I don't want to break users' boxes like in your case
> because some option is no longer recognized. Accepting it and
> doing nothing (or printing a warning) is not a big deal really.
Ahh, so your plan is to ignore it, no
On 24.09.2012 14:43, Marc Lehmann wrote:
[-symlink option apparently added by previous maintainer]
>> Aha. I didn't know that. This is actually rather bad, maybe we should
>> add a compatibility option too, -- because right now, when I specify
>> -nosymlink, it is passed to mount.nfs, and the r
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:27:06PM +0400, Michael Tokarev
wrote:
> Ok. I finally was able to reproduce this (it turned out to be not so easy :).
> And even more, apparently upstream has a fix now:
Wow!
> Aha. I didn't know that. This is actually rather bad, maybe we should
> add a compatibil
Control: tag -1 = confirmed upstream patch
[Answering to a relatively old bugreport, so not removing context...]
On 25.06.2012 14:02, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:23:24PM +0300, Michael Tokarev
> wrote:
>>> seems the symlink mount has also been removed - I have since switche
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:23:24PM +0300, Michael Tokarev
wrote:
> >seems the symlink mount has also been removed - I have since switched to
> >am-utils, which solves both problems, as autofs seems to be eternally
> >broken.
>
> Can you please show the options or maps you were using with autofs?
notfound 678408 4.1.4+debian-3
found 678408 5.0.6-2
tags 678408 + moreinfo
thanks
24.06.2012 3:35, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:05:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev
wrote:
21.06.2012 17:24, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.4+debian-3
Really?
No, sorrry, 5.0.6-
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:05:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev
wrote:
> 21.06.2012 17:24, Marc Lehmann пиÑеÑ:
> >Package: autofs
> >Version: 4.1.4+debian-3
>
> Really?
No, sorrry, 5.0.6-2, but I couldn't easily run reportbug on that machine
(due to autofs failing).
> >after upgrading, accessin
21.06.2012 17:24, Marc Lehmann пишет:
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.4+debian-3
Really?
Severity: important
after upgrading, accessing automount-mountpoints make automount segfault:
Upgrading from what to what?
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.deb
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.4+debian-3
Severity: important
after upgrading, accessing automount-mountpoints make automount segfault:
automount[6339]: segfault at 8 ip 7f4d2c71b701 sp 7f4d2d81c3f8 error
4 in libc-2.13.so[7f4d2c69f000+17a000]
the apparent reason is the use of the "no
9 matches
Mail list logo
