Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:04:34PM -0800, Tom Epperly wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Carsten Leonhardt l...@carotec.de wrote: Dear Tom, is (or was, as your bug report is over 2 years old now) there a specific reason why you had the FDAddress = faerun.epperly.home directive in

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2014-12-01 Thread Tom Epperly
From my perspective, it seems like there must be a class of system services that need to be started after the network is configured and DNS is available. Bacula and other members of that class of services should have a common mechanism to be started after network+DNS are available. I think my

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-07-08 Thread Alexander Golovko
Hi! Sorry for reply delay. There is not a bug, so all we can do - add some information about this case into README.Debian. You can try one of next workarounds: 1. Allow bacula-fd to listen on all addresses - remove line FDAddress = .. or change it to FDAddress = 0.0.0.0 2. If you

Bug#679479: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#679479: bacula-fd fails to start because network is not initialized

2012-07-08 Thread Tom Epperly
Thanks for your reply. I understand from a developer's perspective that there is no bug. Somewhere along the line, I believe a Debian upgrade switched me from using /etc/network/interfaces and ifupdown to using NetworkManager. It happened a while ago, so I don't remember how it all happened. At