flum Ansgar Burchardt, (I'm not subscriped to this bug, if you have futur questions to me please Cc me).
> Given that Philipp Schafft plans to request removal of roaraudio from > Debian[1], I don't think it would be useful to revert this change. I offered both ways: O and RM. The RM is *only* because the removed dependencys (not only openal). If they are re-installed the reason for the RM becomes invalid. I will leave the Debian project anyway (currently pawing over packages to new maintainers). But (not yet in public) there seems to a person interested in taking it. > Also wasn't libroar-compat2 just lowered from a Recommends to a > Suggests? Or have there been further changes in addition to those > mentioned in [2]? I don't think so. Please also check the build-depends to be sure (they likely need to include libroar-dev). Thank you for your work and have a nice day :) -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
