* Adam D. Barratt:
Assuming the incremental change to the previous diff is purely
s/diff/diffutils/ in debian/control, that sounds obviously fine to
include; thanks.
Something similar, a file within the binary package had to be patched.
The source package and debdiff can be found in
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 22:37 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt:
Assuming the incremental change to the previous diff is purely
s/diff/diffutils/ in debian/control, that sounds obviously fine to
include; thanks.
Something similar, a file within the binary package had to be
* Adam D. Barratt:
If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable.
Any news on that?
Yes. in a somewhat unpleasant way: #684885.
This is solved using another one-line diff.
How should I upload the resulting 1:1.18.1-1wheezy1 package?
Cheers,
-Hilko
--
To
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 20:40 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt:
If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable.
Any news on that?
Yes. in a somewhat unpleasant way: #684885.
This is solved using another one-line diff.
How should I upload the
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:14 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 22:08:21 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Would an updated package, with changes over 1:1.18.1-1 as shown in the
attached patch, be acceptable for wheezy?
[...]
If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 22:08:21 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
Would an updated package, with changes over 1:1.18.1-1 as shown in the
attached patch, be acceptable for wheezy?
[...]
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index bfdf63e..e4c5c0a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 22:08:00 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index fb143c4..1f3c435 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ override_dh_install:
# Workaround for python3-defaults 3.2~b2-1
# (do not rename .so files outside
* Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 22:08:00 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index fb143c4..1f3c435 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -130,9 +130,9 @@ override_dh_install:
# Workaround for python3-defaults 3.2~b2-1
# (do not
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:28:10 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
There have been three minor upstream releases since 1.18.1. The project
is based around autoconf/automake (57 Makefile.am files), and much of
the source code for the various language bindings is automatically
generated, so there are
* Julien Cristau:
If this is still not acceptable, what about a 1.18.2-2wheezy1 that just
fixes #678977 (upgrade breakage due to multiarch change), #680885,
#680886 (multiarch coinstall)?
wheezy is not affected by any of those 3 bugs as far as I can tell,
since they're all related to the
* Cyril Brulebois:
Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org (09/07/2012):
I had converted the package to multiarch just before the freeze and only
noticed today that I hadn't noticed that the RC bug I introduced
(#678977) had been reopened after I had marked it as fixed.
Relevant parts of the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking libguestfs.
I had converted the package to multiarch just before the freeze and only
noticed today that I hadn't noticed that the RC bug I introduced
(#678977) had been reopened after I had marked it as fixed.
Relevant
Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org (09/07/2012):
I had converted the package to multiarch just before the freeze and only
noticed today that I hadn't noticed that the RC bug I introduced
(#678977) had been reopened after I had marked it as fixed.
Relevant parts of the changelog are attached
13 matches
Mail list logo