On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
As I said above it should always been in this way from beginning but I
don't know why ttf-indic-fonts was created by mixing all fonts
together during that time.
Because
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
As I said above it should always been in this way from beginning but I
don't know why ttf-indic-fonts was created by mixing all fonts
together during that time.
Because there wasn't any specific policy then and I assumed separation by
language
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Kartik Mistry (kar...@debian.org):
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian-IN Team debian-in-work...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: font-kalapi
Should be fontS-kalapi (yeah, only if
On 18:51 Sat 14 Jul , G Karunakar wrote:
snip
I am out of touch with font package naming rules.. but wondering why
have separate font- , couldn't it go in fonts-gujr-extra ?
When it is upstream what is the meaning of adding it in
fonts-gujr-extra? Basically fonts-gujr-extra is fonts
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian-IN Team debian-in-work...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: font-kalapi
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : GujaratiLexicon Team i...@gujaratilexicon.com
* URL : https://github.com/gujaratilexicon/font-kalapi
* License
Quoting Kartik Mistry (kar...@debian.org):
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian-IN Team debian-in-work...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: font-kalapi
Should be fontS-kalapi (yeah, only if there is only one font in the package)
Version : 0.1
Upstream
6 matches
Mail list logo
