Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal ==== This was discussed on http://bugs.debian.org/639371 and mail as below.
Since Nobuyuki seems not familiar with removal request, i am doing this now. we just had mail exchange as below: I am asking package removal with this mail instead of replying in private mail. Regards, Osamu On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:45:16PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi Osamu, Hi Takatsugu, > > mecab-cannadic in Sid curretly suffers a FTBFS [1] as did > ipadic [2] before Osamu fixed it with my patch. > > I submitted a very similar patch for mecab-cannadic, but given the > last comments in [3] I am not sure that it's really worth an NMU and > should be removed from Sid and Wheezy instead? > > Do you have any strong feelings in either direction? As my Japanese is > limited to baka, neko and kawaii, I have no use for the package so you > should better decide here on your own :) > > Regards > Evgeni > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680827 > [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680834 > [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639371 On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:26:19AM +0900, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote: > At Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:45:16 +0200, > Evgeni Golov wrote: > > > > Hi Osamu, Hi Takatsugu, > > > > mecab-cannadic in Sid curretly suffers a FTBFS [1] as did > > ipadic [2] before Osamu fixed it with my patch. > > > > I submitted a very similar patch for mecab-cannadic, but given the > > last comments in [3] I am not sure that it's really worth an NMU and > > should be removed from Sid and Wheezy instead? > > mecab-cannadic was made to make mecab as main package, because > mecab-ipadic had treated non-free package. > > > Now mecab-ipadic is in main, so there is no reason to keep maintain > mecab-cannadic, I think. So dropping the package is acceptable for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
