Hi Ian,
Being cc'd on this would have been nice, so apologies in advance if I
messed up any quoting by pasting stuff in.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:26:01AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Note: this evening we think we have found a security expert who is
willing to audit the CELT 0.7.1 codec
Ron writes (Re: #682010 re celt and mumble referred to the TC):
You understand this is a fairly arbitrary 'daily' snapshot of an
experimental research codec, from ~2.5 years ago, that nobody has
looked at since that day, that nobody has committed to maintaining,
that its author has explicitly
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 05:38:47, Ron wrote:
...
- This is a serious problem for mumble at least and is arguably RC.
Yes, mumble has a serious problem, that is arguably RC.
In fact it has several of them aside from this corner that people
have painted themselves into with it ...
[…]
Chris Knadle writes (Bug#682010: #682010 re celt and mumble referred to the
TC):
There was no indication of any kind that the discussion was going to
continue, otherwise I would have delayed the summary to the TC.
I think you were right to escalate this to the TC when you did. The
longer we
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:55:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ron writes (Re: #682010 re celt and mumble referred to the TC):
You understand this is a fairly arbitrary 'daily' snapshot of an
experimental research codec, from ~2.5 years ago, that nobody has
looked at since that day, that
Ron writes (Bug#682010: #682010 re celt and mumble referred to the TC):
I don't want to niggle over words here, but chosen would imply that
somebody actually exercised some conscious judgement in that decision.
Which there doesn't really seem to be a whole lot of evidence for.
Nobody from
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:39:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ron writes (Bug#682010: #682010 re celt and mumble referred to the TC):
I don't want to niggle over words here, but chosen would imply that
somebody actually exercised some conscious judgement in that decision.
Which
7 matches
Mail list logo
