Hi,
I can confirm that the patch by you, Andreas, is working fine. The
problems with the conffile are caused by a bug in dpkg [1] and there are
other packages triggering it, like libpam-modules.
Which dpkg versions are affected?
Current unstable and sid. Guillem is aware of the issue (as
On 2012-09-26 14:39, Ralf Jung wrote:
Which dpkg versions are affected?
Current unstable and sid.
probably wheezy and sid which both have dpkg 1.16.8
To avoid this bug, there is still a possibility to split out a -common
package.
I only recently noticed the 304 drivers already migrated to
Hi,
Current unstable and sid.
probably wheezy and sid which both have dpkg 1.16.8
Uhm, sorry, you are right of course.
To avoid this bug, there is still a possibility to split out a -common
package.
The bug is only triggered by calling dpkg with both architectures of the
package at once,
On 2012-09-23 16:03, Ralf Jung wrote:
Hi,
with the 304 drivers in current unstable, this bug even means that 32bit
apps get no acceleration at all since the ia32 packages have already
been removed.
I can confirm that the patch by you, Andreas, is working fine. The
problems with the
Hi,
with the 304 drivers in current unstable, this bug even means that 32bit
apps get no acceleration at all since the ia32 packages have already
been removed.
I can confirm that the patch by you, Andreas, is working fine. The
problems with the conffile are caused by a bug in dpkg [1] and there
Control: found -1 nvidia-graphics-drivers/302.17-1
Control: block -1 by 640499
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2012-08-27 22:31, Donald Boyd wrote:
apt-get update apt-get install libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386
The nvidia driver was removed and debconf warning was triggered --
This is caused by
6 matches
Mail list logo
