Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-08-06 Thread Len Ovens
Ron r...@debian.org wrote: So this needs to be resolved if there ever is anything that's to go in the distro that uses them. But while there isn't, it can also wait until more urgent things are completed too, and everything just settles down a bit in general and stops changing as rapidly as

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-06 Thread Ron
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:30:51AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: On 07/01/2013 05:59 PM, Ron wrote: [..] So I'm still not really sure what showstopper complexity you are worried about there. Sample accurate alignment of buffered netjack streams with the rest of jack. updating

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-02 Thread Robin Gareus
On 07/01/2013 05:59 PM, Ron wrote: [..] So I'm still not really sure what showstopper complexity you are worried about there. Sample accurate alignment of buffered netjack streams with the rest of jack. updating port-latencies,.. Sounds easy, but it's not. The realshowstopper there is lack of

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-01 Thread Robin Gareus
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote: My understanding of the background prior to that is that Robin had some discussion with some of the developers at FOMS, who at the time suggested the custom modes probably would be appropriate for the use described to them. correct. derf aka Tim Terriberry

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote: Hi! I'll limit my response to the aspect of symbols, since Robin has already answered the other questions. Just sketching now: libopus0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus.so.0 (business as usual) libopus-custom-0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus-custom.so.0

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-01 Thread Ron
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 11:15:10AM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote: My understanding of the background prior to that is that Robin had some discussion with some of the developers at FOMS, who at the time suggested the custom modes probably would be appropriate

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-07-01 Thread Ron
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:40:19PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote: On 06/30/2013 03:11 AM, Ron wrote: Hi! I'll limit my response to the aspect of symbols, since Robin has already answered the other questions. Just sketching now: libopus0 will provide /usr/lib/libopus.so.0 (business as

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-06-29 Thread Robin Gareus
Hi *, Ron (debian maintainer of libopus - CCed via @bugs..) ping'ed me yesterday to follow up on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686777 To recap: netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes but libopus on debian does not provide custom modes. When enabling custom

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-06-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Robin Gareus (2013-06-29 17:59:21) Hi *, Ron (debian maintainer of libopus - CCed via @bugs..) ping'ed me yesterday to follow up on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686777 To recap: netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes but libopus on debian

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-06-29 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 06/29/2013 05:59 PM, Robin Gareus wrote: To recap: netjack2's + opus needs libopus with --custom-modes but libopus on debian does not provide custom modes. Thoughts? Opinions? Volunteers? Ron, what do you think about the following? Instead of using embedded copies in jackd1/2, let's

Bug#686777: netjack2 + opus custom modes + debian

2013-06-29 Thread Ron
Hi, So the background (that's been missing from the BTS up until now) is that shortly after Robin initially reported this bug, he also contacted us upstream and we had a fairly detailed discussion on IRC about all the various issues. Since Debian was in freeze there wasn't much going to happen