Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-25 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2013/2/24 Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com: 2013/2/24 Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org: Thanks. So the only thing we are missing according to my information is buildd configuration for armhf. Can the porters give an update for that? If none beats me to it, I'll configure

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-24 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, February 23, 2013 16:54, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: armhf and s390x don't have any set up yet. I've set up wheezy-security on zemlinsky and zandonai today. Thanks. So the only thing we are missing according to my information is

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-24 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2013/2/24 Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org: On Sat, February 23, 2013 16:54, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: armhf and s390x don't have any set up yet. I've set up wheezy-security on zemlinsky and zandonai today. Thanks. So the only

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-23 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: armhf and s390x don't have any set up yet. I've set up wheezy-security on zemlinsky and zandonai today. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:12:57PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:27:14AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi wb-team, I read in this bug log that most aspects of wheezy-security have been taken care of, but Philipp reported on Jan 4 that the buildds still need to be

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi wb-team, I read in this bug log that most aspects of wheezy-security have been taken care of, but Philipp reported on Jan 4 that the buildds still need to be taken care of. Can something be said about the progress of that? How far along are we? It would be great if we could have a guinea pig

Bug#687334: buildds ready for wheezy-security?

2013-02-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:27:14AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi wb-team, I read in this bug log that most aspects of wheezy-security have been taken care of, but Philipp reported on Jan 4 that the buildds still need to be taken care of. Can something be said about the progress of that?