Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:27 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
On 31 October 2012 14:44, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
Please unblock package aptitude (pre-approve)
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve the command line handling. I refer you to [1] and [2] for the
complete details. At the moment most commands do not
On 31 October 2012 14:44, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
Please unblock package aptitude (pre-approve)
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve the command line handling. I refer you to
On 31 October 2012 14:44, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
I have also attached another patch which is entirely optional, but of
notable value to end users and relatively non-invasive. It brings in
support for
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 October 2012 14:44, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
I have also attached another patch which is entirely optional, but of
notable value to end
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 16 October 2012 17:37, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2012 09:32, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2012 05:10, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Assuming I'm reading the above correctly and there'll be
On 24 September 2012 09:32, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 September 2012 05:10, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Assuming I'm reading the above correctly and there'll be another unblock
request after this one,
Correct.
do you have an estimate as to how much
Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com (25/09/2012):
I did aim to keep the changes in .8.2 minimal to facilitate a speedy
approval for the xz and translation updates.
I have no upload priv., so here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aptitude/aptitude_0.6.8.1-2.dsc
I leave it to
Heya Daniel,
Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com (13/09/2012):
* Use xz compression for all binaries. (Closes: #687294)
given there are many more changes (in the diff you attached, and in the
version planned after that), could we please have a minimal aptitude
upload right now to get XZ
On 25 September 2012 00:33, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Heya Daniel,
Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com (13/09/2012):
* Use xz compression for all binaries. (Closes: #687294)
given there are many more changes (in the diff you attached, and in the
version planned after that),
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
The fixes for this have been in experimental since July. The minor
update presented here contains some of those needed to support the
rest in the next release.
I fully expect that next release to be the
On 24 September 2012 05:10, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Assuming I'm reading the above correctly and there'll be another unblock
request after this one,
Correct.
do you have an estimate as to how much longer it
will be before that version will be ready?
The work is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aptitude (pre-approve)
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve the command line handling. I refer you to [1] and [2] for the
13 matches
Mail list logo
