Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-08 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 08:31:45 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > > The former, i.e. "<< X"; it should break everything less than the first > > fixed version of those packages, since there are broken (pun > > intended). > > Actually, (being a bit pedantic) you should use "<< X~", so backports > cannot s

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-07 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-08 01:35, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 23:44:12 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> Is this the right syntax for the break clause: >> >> Breaks: jakarta-jmeter (<< 2.8-1), >> jenkins-instance-identity (<< 1.3-1), >> jglobus (<< 2.0.6-1), >> libitext

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 23:44:12 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Is this the right syntax for the break clause: > > Breaks: jakarta-jmeter (<< 2.8-1), > jenkins-instance-identity (<< 1.3-1), > jglobus (<< 2.0.6-1), > libitext-java (<< 2.1.7-6), > libpdfbox-java (<< 1:1.

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Is this the right syntax for the break clause: Breaks: jakarta-jmeter (<< 2.8-1), jenkins-instance-identity (<< 1.3-1), jglobus (<< 2.0.6-1), libitext-java (<< 2.1.7-6), libpdfbox-java (<< 1:1.8.2+dfsg-1), voms-api-java (<< 2.0.9-1.1) I listed only the pack

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-05 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-05 11:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 05/09/2013 10:19, Niels Thykier a écrit : > >> Does bouncycastle now force packages the affected reverse dependencies >> to be upgraded with it? If not, it will still break partial upgrades. > > All of the reverse dependencies that were updated in t

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 05/09/2013 10:19, Niels Thykier a écrit : > Does bouncycastle now force packages the affected reverse dependencies > to be upgraded with it? If not, it will still break partial upgrades. All of the reverse dependencies that were updated in this transition have the correct versionned dependency

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-05 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-09-05 10:03, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Isn't it time to close this now? > > Mattias > > > > Does bouncycastle now force packages the affected reverse dependencies to be upgraded with it? If not, it will still break partial upgrades. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu

Bug#687694: Close?

2013-09-05 Thread Mattias Ellert
Isn't it time to close this now? Mattias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part