Bug#688772: Current options for resolving 688772 [Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome]

2012-12-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Don Armstrong writes: > Ok, so this option C would involve not overriding the maintainer, > coupled with requesting documentation in the release notes, and would > also supplant 5 and 6 in the A and B versions. Ah, yes, indeed, it would. > I've gone ahead and updated the current don_draft.txt w

Bug#688772: Current options for resolving 688772 [Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome]

2012-12-02 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012, Russ Allbery wrote: > Don Armstrong writes: > > This is the current text of the options for #688772. I'd like to vote on > > this before the 9th if at all possible. If anyone has any comments, > > changes, or would like to propose different options, please do so now. > > Afte

Bug#688772: Current options for resolving 688772 [Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome]

2012-12-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Don Armstrong writes: > This is the current text of the options for #688772. I'd like to vote on > this before the 9th if at all possible. If anyone has any comments, > changes, or would like to propose different options, please do so now. After considering this and following the discussion, I'm

Bug#688772: Current options for resolving 688772 [Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome]

2012-12-02 Thread Don Armstrong
This is the current text of the options for #688772. I'd like to vote on this before the 9th if at all possible. If anyone has any comments, changes, or would like to propose different options, please do so now. === START === 1. The TC notes the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to implem