Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: user d...@debian.org
Control: usertags -1 + multiarch
> The manpages don't seem to be always the same across archs. Might
> depend on the version of the tools they're built with.
This usually can be fixed by binNMUs. Is there anything else preventing applying
th
Package: libxi-dev
Version: 2:1.7.4-1+b2
Followup-For: Bug #689068
Dear Maintainer,
The reason why the packages were different between builds is that some of the
documentation's anchor ids where automatically generated and thus different for
each build. So the solution is simply to explicitly s
Dear Maintainer, could you please explain what stops this package from
Multi-Arch:same support? It would really help in cross-compiling.
Regards, Alexey
Package: libxi-dev
Version: 2:1.7.1.901-1
Followup-For: Bug #689068
Dear Maintainer,
The following patch marks libxcomposite-dev Multi-Arch: same.
Every shared files are identical across architectures so nothing else is needed
to make it multiarch cross-installable.
regards,
Nicolas Le Cam
***
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 23:27:53 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Package: libxi-dev
> Version: 2:1.6.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The amd64 version conflicts with the i386 one which makes it impossible to
> install both. As a result the /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libXi.so symbol
Package: libxi-dev
Version: 2:1.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The amd64 version conflicts with the i386 one which makes it impossible to
install both. As a result the /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libXi.so symbolic link is
missing so that developping 32bit applications using this library is
6 matches
Mail list logo