Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-16 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, Sorry, completely forgot about that... On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote: * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of them ! >>> Absolutely. Done. >>> I di

Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-11 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
Salut On Wednesday 10 October 2012 19:59:11 Vincent Fourmond wrote: >>> * I don't see the point of including session dumps - especially 4MB of >>> them ! >> Absolutely. Done. >> I did not change the orig tarball however. Right? > > Hmmm... I'm unsure about that, since the copyright status of

Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-10 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Hello and thank you very much for your review! > > On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote: >> * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to >> unstable will follow the release of wheezy > > It

Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-07 Thread Jean-Michel Vourgère
Hello and thank you very much for your review! On Sunday 07 October 2012 09:09:28 Vincent Fourmond wrote: > * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to > unstable will follow the release of wheezy It makes sense. Done. > * I don't see the point of including session d

Bug#689715: Review of eyefiserver-2.3~rc1-1

2012-10-07 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello ! Here are my comments on the eyefiserver package, as it is now. I don't have any means to check it works fine on my system, as I lack the corresponding hardware. There are several minor details to fix: * I'd prefer the package to target experimental as of now; upload to unstabl