Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 13:15 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: > On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: > > debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source package. This [...] > > s/debin/debian/ ;-) > > Oh, just fixed in git repo. [

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-25 Thread Guo Yixuan
On 10/26/2012 02:17 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 23:47 +0800, Guo Yixuan wrote: >> Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc > > > Debian GCC maintainers kindly provide required documentation patches under > debin/gcc/patches/ directory in the Debian gcc-X.Y source package. This >

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-25 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello, > >> | DMUA removed now.[2] > I guess Steffen somehow missed the memo? (*hint hint*) :) I'll go for it when I am back with my key tonight. I hope you have all played with Yixuan's nice BOINC (http://wiki.debian.org/BOINC) packages, too. Cheers, Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-24 Thread Samuel Bronson
On Oct 24, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote: , | > | >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently, | >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA | >> field and ask my sponsor, S

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:11 -0400, root wrote: > , > | > > | >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently, > | >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA > | >> field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission > | >> interfa

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-24 Thread root
, | > | >> Perhaps the DMUA field adds some security concern. However currently, | >> neither Samuel nor I am a DM. In later versions, I'll just drop DMUA | >> field and ask my sponsor, Steffen, to use the new DM permission | >> interface (after I become a DM). | > | > The DMUA field is in the

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-16 Thread Guo Yixuan
On 10/13/2012 11:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote: >> 于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道: >>> Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious >>> connection with the package? >> >> This is because Samuel did most of the packaging wor

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote: 于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道: Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious connection with the package? This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year ago, and I just updated it to match current gc

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Guo Yixuan
于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote: Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj and gnat)

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote: Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf. Why

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-05 Thread Guo Yixuan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj and gnat) in