Dear Andreas!
Le vendredi, 3 janvier 2014, 23.53:48 Andreas Barth a écrit :
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140103 23:43]:
Considering you've had your chance to respond to this (and given
that you managed to respond in less than a half-hour last time), I
have uploaded the
* Marco Balmer (ma...@balmer.name) [140115 21:26]:
Le vendredi, 3 janvier 2014, 23.53:48 Andreas Barth a écrit :
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140103 23:43]:
Considering you've had your chance to respond to this (and given
that you managed to respond in less than a half-hour
Hi again Andreas,
Le vendredi, 3 janvier 2014, 23.53:48 Andreas Barth a écrit :
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140103 23:43]:
Considering you've had your chance to respond to this (and given
that you managed to respond in less than a half-hour last time), I
have uploaded the
Le jeudi, 2 janvier 2014, 19.08:14 Didier '' Raboud a écrit :
Le jeudi, 2 janvier 2014, 18.49:31 Andreas Barth a écrit :
So please remove your upload until I can review the situation again.
It hasn't been uploaded yet, as it was building on my slow server. But
unless you oppose the patch
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140103 23:43]:
Le jeudi, 2 janvier 2014, 19.08:14 Didier '' Raboud a écrit :
Le jeudi, 2 janvier 2014, 18.49:31 Andreas Barth a écrit :
So please remove your upload until I can review the situation again.
It hasn't been uploaded yet, as it was
Hi Andreas,
This opposition of yours was more than one year ago:
Le dimanche, 7 octobre 2012, 19.26:08 Andreas Barth a écrit :
With my mgetty maintainer hat on, I refuse any NMU with this (or a
similar) patch applied, unless otherwise authorized by me (as
exception of my easy NMU policy I
* Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org) [140102 18:39]:
Hi Andreas,
This opposition of yours was more than one year ago:
Le dimanche, 7 octobre 2012, 19.26:08 Andreas Barth a écrit :
With my mgetty maintainer hat on, I refuse any NMU with this (or a
similar) patch applied, unless
Hi Andreas,
Le jeudi, 2 janvier 2014, 18.49:31 Andreas Barth a écrit :
… and this new proposal was more than six months ago:
I opposed having an upload of
rmdir -rf /var/run/mgetty || true
Sure; I read that. That said, gregoa's patch is significantly different
from that, as it does the
Control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:10:36 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: mgetty
Version: 1.1.36-1.6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
/var/run may be a temporary filesystem, so any directories or files needed
/there must be created dynamically at boot time.
Refer
Hi Andreas!
On 10/08/2012 01:26 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
tags 689899 - patch
thanks
* Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) [121007 17:15]:
[]
+rmdir -rf /var/run/mgetty || true;
eh, no.
Yes, that's an obvious mistake. But to my defense, I made 28 of them, so
of course, there
Package: mgetty
Version: 1.1.36-1.6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de reported in -devel that your package
(as well as 27 others) ships a folder either in /var/run or /var/lock. This
is forbidden by policy.
Lintian detects the problem and warns
severity 689899 important
thanks
On 07/10/2012 17:10, Thomas Goirand wrote:
+ * mgetty-fax doesn't ship /var/run/mgetty-fax anymore (Closes: #XX).
Shipping a file or directory under /var/run is not RC. What's RC is to
not check for the existence of (e.g.) /var/run/mgetty before using it.
severity 689899 important
thanks
Hi,
* Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) [121007 17:15]:
Severity: serious
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de reported in -devel that your package
(as well as 27 others) ships a folder either in /var/run or /var/lock. This
is forbidden by policy.
However,
tags 689899 - patch
thanks
* Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) [121007 17:15]:
[]
+rmdir -rf /var/run/mgetty || true;
eh, no.
With my mgetty maintainer hat on, I refuse any NMU with this (or a
similar) patch applied, unless otherwise authorized by me (as
exception of my easy NMU
14 matches
Mail list logo
