Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2013-01-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed [...] Please go ahead; sorry for the delay. Thank you for your review. Any ETA for an upload? Regards, Adam -- To

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2013-01-05 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed [...] Please go ahead; sorry for

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-12-29 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: OK, I fixed the following in 0.18.9-5. - openvrml (0.18.9-5) unstable; urgency=low * Move example directory

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-12-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 13:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: OK, I fixed the following in 0.18.9-5. - openvrml (0.18.9-5) unstable; urgency=low * Move example directory in libopenvrml9 to libopenvrml-doc. * Add Multi-Arch: same to libopenvrml9 and

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-11-27 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:00 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben: However,

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-11-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:00 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben: However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x. If this still does

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-11-03 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, Philipp. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Nobuhiro, am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben: However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x. If this still does (if a release team permits this), I

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-10-22 Thread Philipp Kern
Nobuhiro, am Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:41:27AM +0900 hast du folgendes geschrieben: However, I think that it is already late to put in support of s390x. If this still does (if a release team permits this), I will set linux-any . you could testbuild it on the porter box, but a new build wouldn't

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-10-21 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Please unblock package openvrml. I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4. - Fix multiarch support

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-10-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 11:45 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Please unblock package openvrml. I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4. - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489) Specifically, _remove_ multiarch support. Might it

Bug#690610: unblock: openvrml/0.18.9-4

2012-10-15 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock package openvrml. I made the following corrections by 0.18.9-2 to 0.18.9-4. - Fix multiarch support for libopenvrml9 . (Closes: #674489) - Enable hardening and fix