On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I have no strong opinion about this, as I simply lack the experience
with such tools. Do you already have a candidate to replace deutex
in mind or are you going to fork it and develop it into the desired
direction?
I might
Am 25.10.2012 14:44, schrieb Jon Dowland:
I might possibly write an alternative from scratch (not in C).
OTOH, freedoom relies on deutex in its build process and even provides
a minimal doom2.wad for bootstrapping purposes (maybe we should ship
that with the deutex package to have it work
Am 24.10.2012 17:39, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Sure. I think we need to replace deutex, really. There's a small risk
that one day, Freedoom's palette might differ from Doom's, in which case
we'll introduce subtle differences/problems by relying on it. But Doom's
palette is not copyrightable; once
Am 23.10.2012 22:35, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Do you think this is worthy of requesting a freeze exception: the prboom.wad
build issue is not technically an FTBFS, but it's certainly in the same
spirit...
I don't think it's such a severe issue.
First, as you stated, it isn't technically an
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I don't think it's such a severe issue.
First, as you stated, it isn't technically an FTBFS; it does not
keep you from building binary packages from the sources we provide.
It just keeps you from creating *our* sources from
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59:54PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 22.10.2012 11:58, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
We could simply state that we require freedom for the rebuild and add
that symlink - just as we require imagemagick, sng and deutex.
Apart from that, freedoom is the only iwad
Package: deutex
Version: 4.4.902-13
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
since version 0.6.4-4 the freedoom package does not provide a doom2.wad file
anymore for compatibility issues. However, deutex expects a file of that name
and does not consider freedoom.wad as a valid replacement. The
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:43:30AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
since version 0.6.4-4 the freedoom package does not provide a doom2.wad file
anymore for compatibility issues. However, deutex expects a file of that name
and does not consider freedoom.wad as a valid replacement. The attached
Am 22.10.2012 11:24, schrieb Jon Dowland:
Not sure whether patching deutex is the best approach. Symlinking
debian/tmp/doom2.wad (in the prboom build directory) to
/usr/share/games/freedoom.wad would at least restrict the damage to the prboom
sources. But I guess we'd need to
Am 22.10.2012 11:58, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
We could simply state that we require freedom for the rebuild and add
that symlink - just as we require imagemagick, sng and deutex.
Apart from that, freedoom is the only iwad available from Debian main,
so we should maybe support it in deutex
10 matches
Mail list logo
