On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:49 PM, A. Costa agco...@gis.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:38:45 +0200
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
True. And that is intentional as combining two separate searches
is a logical OR and not an AND as the combined list includes packages
reopen 691453 !
thanks
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:38:45 +0200
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
True. And that is intentional as combining two separate searches
is a logical OR and not an AND as the combined list includes packages
which match foo but not bar.
E.g.
2 matches
Mail list logo