Hello,
2013/6/5 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com (04/06/2013):
I just received several bug reports about this issue and decided to
investigate.
Many thanks!
+1
Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
new such items would be
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet
seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules, causing
non-zero exit in case there are some hits?
Loïc Minier loic.min...@dooz.org (05/06/2013):
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any
new such items would be spotted early? The following shell snippet
seems to do the trick, and could be added to debian/rules,
* Loïc Minier loic.min...@dooz.org [2013-06-05 13:40]:
Yeah, I've pushed a test_db script which currently only tests for
unknown fields (case sensitively)
Can you please upload to unstable.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [2013-01-02 19:37]:
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
program is required in some situations.
I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com (04/06/2013):
* Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [2013-01-02 19:37]:
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
program is required in some situations.
I
control: tag -1 patch
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
each device, including a list of required packages. It will install
those required packages. u-boot-tools is listed for
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 21:50:56 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
control: tag -1 patch
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
each device, including a list of required packages.
control: tag -1 -patch
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Since the release is getting close, I've gone ahead with an nmu adding
u-boot-tools as a real dependency. Uploaded to delayed/5 to give
you a chance to do a maintainer upload if desired. Please see
attached patch.
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I disagree. flash-kernel maintains a database with information about
each device, including a list of required packages. It will install
those required packages. u-boot-tools is listed for the Linkstation,
so the real question is why it's not being installed.
Hi $Uploaders,
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (29/12/2012):
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi, and thanks for your report.
u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
What do
Hi,
2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (29/12/2012):
u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
What do others think?
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my
* Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [2013-01-02 19:50]:
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it is a
good idea to rely on Recommends being installed if the mkimage
program is required in some situations.
I'm ready to upload flash-kernel with that fix.
works for
Quoting Hector Oron (hector.o...@gmail.com):
Hi,
2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (29/12/2012):
u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
What do
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi, and thanks for your report.
u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
What do others think?
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure it
Package: debian-installer
Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Clean installing Debian 7 with Beta3 netinstall on Linkstation Pro/Live fails
kernel install.
Started by copying uImage and
Control: reassign -1 flash-kernel 3.3
Control: severity -1 serious
Suschman susch...@gmx.net (20/11/2012):
Package: debian-installer
Version: debian armel beta3 installer on linkstation pro
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Clean
17 matches
Mail list logo
