Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:10:15AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 19:43:57 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:13:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 16:50:32 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: That's a question for the

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 19:38:15 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:04:07PM +, Paul Evans wrote: Package: xterm Version: 278-2 Severity: normal (re-submission in case the previous did not make it) Current version in debian is still 278; this is rather old

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 20:40:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I'm looking at 287, and have a problem with the desktop file: Another thing: the manpage change in 283 (to use a macro for xterm) seems to break 'whatis': $ lexgrog xterm.man xterm.man: parse failed resulting in: $ whatis xterm

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:20:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 20:40:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I'm looking at 287, and have a problem with the desktop file: Another thing: the manpage change in 283 (to use a macro for xterm) seems to break 'whatis': $

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:40:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 19:38:15 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:04:07PM +, Paul Evans wrote: Package: xterm Version: 278-2 Severity: normal (re-submission in case the previous did not

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 20:33:06 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:40:26PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I'm looking at 287, and have a problem with the desktop file: ACTUAL_XTERM=`echo xterm|sed 's,x,x,'` \ /bin/sh -c 'for n in ../xterm.desktop

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-26 Thread Paul LeoNerd Evans
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 07:38:15PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: There are several features and fixes. I released #279 a few weeks before the current freeze began; however it was fairly large, and according to the package maintainer beyond his ability to inspect it. Direct access to my source

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:50:42PM +, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 07:38:15PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: There are several features and fixes. I released #279 a few weeks before the current freeze began; however it was fairly large, and according to the package

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 16:50:32 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: That's a question for the package maintainer (who seems to be absent). That, or they have limited free time. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:13:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 16:50:32 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: That's a question for the package maintainer (who seems to be absent). That, or they have limited free time. no problem (the followup helps). It still would be

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 19:43:57 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:13:05PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 16:50:32 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: That's a question for the package maintainer (who seems to be absent). That, or they have

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-25 Thread Paul Evans
Package: xterm Version: 278-2 Severity: normal (re-submission in case the previous did not make it) Current version in debian is still 278; this is rather old by now. There are several updates in later versions that I would like to make use of. Ideally at least version 282 would be lovely.

Bug#694375: xterm: Please update to a later upstream version

2012-11-25 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 09:04:07PM +, Paul Evans wrote: Package: xterm Version: 278-2 Severity: normal (re-submission in case the previous did not make it) Current version in debian is still 278; this is rather old by now. There are several updates in later versions that I would like