Hi Andreas
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 02:42:26AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #694395
Control: found -1 0.06-2
Hi,
what I didn't take into account in my analysis were the virtual packages
provided by perl-modules: they include libextutils-command-perl, so
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 08:47 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
@Adam, the unblock hint for 0.06-2 get's invalid thus, sorry about
that.
Updated for -3; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Followup-For: Bug #694395
Control: found -1 0.06-2
Hi,
what I didn't take into account in my analysis were the virtual packages
provided by perl-modules: they include libextutils-command-perl, so
libshell-command-perl cannot use unversioned Breaks+Replaces.
Please make the B+R versioned, e.g.
Package: libshell-command-perl
Version: 0.06-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: squeeze-wheezy (partial) upgrade
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their
4 matches
Mail list logo
