Hello,
as ole already mentioned the source package name is far too generic. I'm not
familiar with java packaging policies, but I would also expect nom.tam to
appear somewhere in the package name or description. It would make it clear on
first sight which java fits library it is.
I coudl not
On 30/11/2012 14:41, Florian Rothmaier wrote:
Am 26.11.2012 17:10, schrieb Olе Streicher:
* Since the original code is under PD, would you consider to put the
Debian package under a less restrictive license than GPL?
I sent a mail to debian-legal to ask which license should be chosen
for
Hi Florian,
Florian Rothmaier froth...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de writes:
* Package name: fits
[...]
* License : public-domain
Some short comments:
* I would not name the (source) package fits since this is too short
and misleading (I would expect a generic fits handling package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Rothmaier froth...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de
* Package name: fits
Version : 1.10.0
Upstream Author : Thomas A. McGlynn thomas.a.mcgl...@nasa.gov
* URL : http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/heasarc/fits/java/
* License :
hi,
as ole already mentioned the source package name is far too generic.
I'm not familiar with java packaging policies, but I would also expect
nom.tam to appear somewhere in the package name or description.
It would make it clear on first sight which java fits library it is.
--
To
5 matches
Mail list logo
