Bug#694986: flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS

2019-03-13 Thread Pierre Ynard
> * What will break if FSCKFIX=yes will be set on by default? There's an open bug for changing the default to yes, #637087. Reportedly, what might break is MD/LVM setups if fsck gets mistakenly run with -y on the wrong device; the discussion about this is rather unconclusive. > By the way

Bug#694986: flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS

2018-12-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tag -1 +moreinfo [2014-11-11 20:32] Petter Reinholdtsen > Control: severity -1 important > > I'm not sure this is fixable, but I am sure it isn't release critical. > Reduce the severity to important to reflect this fact. Dear co-maintainers and maintainers of flash-kernel, what is

Bug#694986: flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS

2014-11-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: severity -1 important I'm not sure this is fixable, but I am sure it isn't release critical. Reduce the severity to important to reflect this fact. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#694986: flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS

2014-02-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I read this bug report, but fail to understand what exactly it is expected for the sysvinit maintainers to do here. Anyone care to explain what more can be done in this case? Roger, you cloned it instead of reassigning it. What did you have in mind? -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen --

Bug#694986: flash-kernel: postinst modifies /etc/default/rcS

2014-02-04 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I read this bug report, but fail to understand what exactly it is expected for the sysvinit maintainers to do here. Anyone care to explain what more can be done in this case? Roger, you cloned it instead of reassigning