Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:14:15 +0100
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> We shouldn't include the vfs modules in the samba 4 package - they're
> already (albeit an older version) included in the 'samba' package and
> they're not actually necessary for the current samba4 file server.
Okay, it's enough, I
tags 697105 -patch
thanks
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 00:36 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> It seems to be that just forget to include vfs modules in samba4.install.
> patch attached (it maybe overkill since include all vfs modules, but it
> would fix the issue, though).
Thanks for the patch.
The vfs
Control: tags -1 + patch
thanks
Hi,
It seems to be that just forget to include vfs modules in samba4.install.
patch attached (it maybe overkill since include all vfs modules, but it
would fix the issue, though).
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.
Package: samba4
Version: 4.0.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am happy that samba 4 has ben released.
The selection of the Server role does not work.
I did not want that the Samba server should be provisioned automatically.
root@dc43:~# apt-get -t experimental install samba4
Paketli
4 matches
Mail list logo
