On 03/03/13 13:57, Vitaly Pashkov wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
popcon showed exactly _zero_ installations.
Probably a popcon bug or something, which is a different question. We
are using clvm in 2 clusters currently and all of the nodes in it have
popcon
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Somebody would have to properly maintain its dependencies in debian
(redhat-cluster, and by extension gfs2-utils, corosync, ...). They're
the reason the clvm package had to go.
Hi Julien,
We're running clvm over Corosync in wheezy (were using
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 15:57:52 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I am interested in continuing maintaining clvm in Ubuntu. I'm not sure
about Debian.
Is help required testing/maintaining the clvm portion of the package?
Somebody would have to properly maintain its dependencies in debian
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
The maintainer may not use clvm but many of us who have built large
scale production clusters do.
popcon showed exactly _zero_ installations.
Probably a popcon bug or something, which is a different question. We
are using clvm in 2
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:03:03PM +1000, Dave Whitla wrote:
Installation of clvm from the sid repository currently fails unless versions
are overridden due to the cLVM binary not having been built for the current
upstream LVM version.
There is no clvm binary package anymore.
The
Hi Bastian,
Please comment on this bug, because we're hitting a dead end here,
especially now that 2.02.95-6 has migrated into wheezy but upgrading
requires removing clvm, which we use. Can you see any alternatives
people using clvm could switch to? Or can we somehow help you to keep
clvm in
I'm much surprised that a disruptive change like dropping cluster
support from the lvm2 package was put forward this late in the wheezy
freeze cycle. What's the real reason for it? Some people use it to
their satisfaction and don't have a quick replacement on hand, and those
who don't like it
I am interested in continuing maintaining clvm in Ubuntu. I'm not sure
about Debian.
Is help required testing/maintaining the clvm portion of the package?
--
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.95-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Installation of clvm from the sid repository currently fails unless versions
are overridden due to the cLVM binary not having been built for the current
upstream LVM version.
While building clvm (and enabling cluster locking in
Clustered lvm remains fully supported upstream and a new experimental
version is even under development (using sanlock).
If the current maintainer chooses not to maintain it in Debian any more,
then perhaps a new maintainer would step forward and package it
separately? Otherwise you could switch
10 matches
Mail list logo
