Le samedi 19 janvier 2013 18:10:22, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> #621833 is still open, and I'm not aware of any other package doing this
> lock thing. So yeah, I'd prefer if it didn't come back now. And then
> you can get 621833 to a conclusion some time in the next two years and
> do things di
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 15:50:31 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> In fine you decide wether it's fine or not for tpu. If you don't want this
> I'll comply for the tpu upload. I put it back because I assumed it was the
> recommended procedure. It's mentionned several time in policy bug #621833
Le samedi 19 janvier 2013 13:31:59, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 16:01:06 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package dspam
> >
> > [this
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 16:01:06 +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package dspam
>
> [this is a preapproval unblock request]
>
> Bug #695275 "harmful actions in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dspam
[this is a preapproval unblock request]
Bug #695275 "harmful actions in multiple postrm scripts of M-A:same
packages" was not fixed completely by previous uplo
5 matches
Mail list logo
