Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 20:21 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > > The package I prepared and built for testing also required 2 other > > > patches, to f

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-11 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing > > > package "just" requires the source

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing > > package "just" requires the source file split or if there were any other > > issues? > > The package

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-03 Thread David Paleino
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D.

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-02-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, a

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-02-15 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues > > > fixing there in any case, however we pr

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-02-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues > > fixing there in any case, however we proceed; thanks. > > Done, 3.1.0~rc2-2 just uploaded to sid. That wa

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-01-27 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 19:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > [..] > > > I made a patch both for the version in sid, and the one in testing. > > I'd really prefer to upload it to sid, and then let it flow to testing, but > > the current ups

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 19:45 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > It seems like I could come up with a patch. A whole day's worth work :) Thanks! > I made a patch both for the version in sid, and the one in testing. > I'd really prefer to upload it to sid, and then let it flow to testing, but > the > cu

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-01-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 09:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 > user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertags 698341 = pu Nope. "pu" is for stable; fixed up. > I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-01-19 Thread David Paleino
retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 user 698341 release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 698341 = pu thanks Hello RT, let's try to fix this instead of going for removal. I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075 [0], and checked that it comp