Bug#698477: Re: Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-21 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 2016-07-21 20:27:53, James Bromberger wrote: > On 21/07/2016 3:58 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> lucas: it's not suitable for deb.d.o in its current > > configuration. > > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> as I said whenever somebody last asked about it. > > 09:25 < lucas> is this

Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-21 Thread James Bromberger
On 21/07/2016 3:58 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> lucas: it's not suitable for deb.d.o in its current > configuration. > 09:25 <@Mithrandir> as I said whenever somebody last asked about it. > 09:25 < lucas> is this documented somewhere? if it's not suitable for >

Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 21/07/16 at 09:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit : > > > > do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have > > CloudFront > > CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS? > > Hi Marcin, > > I think

Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 03:48:23PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz a écrit : > > do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have > CloudFront > CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS? Hi Marcin, I think that http(s)://cloudfront.debian.net/ is exactly what we need. And I

Bug#698477: Do we really need mirror in AWS?

2016-07-20 Thread Marcin Kulisz
Hi Charles, do you think that there is still need for mirror on AWS once we have CloudFront CDN which is working quite nicely from within AWS? I don't think we can gain much more speed wise and as to lowering transfer costs for our users I don't think that it'll change much in this case either