On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:35:35AM +0100, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote:
> I've seen other reports about 3.6 but I've opened a new bug since they are
> duplicated and confusing.
And how does yet another bug report make this less confusing?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael
> I'm attaching a patch to compile with debian 3.7 kernel
> I don't known when VM_RESERVED gone in kernel, my patch checks for 3.7
> I've seen other reports about 3.6 but I've opened a new bug since they are
> duplicated and confusing.
>
> the check can be done on VM_RESERVED definition but the bet
Package: virtualbox-dkms
Version: 4.1.18-dfsg-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
I'm attaching a patch to compile with debian 3.7 kernel
I don't known when VM_RESERVED gone in kernel, my patch checks for 3.7
I've seen other reports about 3.6 but I've opened a new bug since they are
duplica
3 matches
Mail list logo