Hey Niels,
Martin Pitt [2013-01-31 9:42 +0100]:
> Niels Thykier [2013-01-31 9:25 +0100]:
> > On 2013-01-31 07:02, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > Niels Thykier [2013-01-22 12:19 +0100]:
> > >> Should such tests request for the source directory to be "rw" or use
> > >> /var/tmp (or )?
> > >
> > > IMHO
Niels Thykier [2013-01-31 9:25 +0100]:
> On 2013-01-31 07:02, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Niels Thykier [2013-01-22 12:19 +0100]:
> >> Should such tests request for the source directory to be "rw" or use
> >> /var/tmp (or )?
> >
> > IMHO this is the right choice, just like for very large temporary dat
On 2013-01-31 07:02, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Niels Thykier [2013-01-22 12:19 +0100]:
>> Should such tests request for the source directory to be "rw" or use
>> /var/tmp (or )?
>
> IMHO this is the right choice, just like for very large temporary data in
> general (for which /tmp/ generally isn't appr
Niels Thykier [2013-01-22 12:19 +0100]:
> Should such tests request for the source directory to be "rw" or use
> /var/tmp (or )?
IMHO this is the right choice, just like for very large temporary data in
general (for which /tmp/ generally isn't appropriate).
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
Package: autopkgtest
Version: 2.2.3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Reading through the autopkgtest spec, I did not see any (endorsed) way
for tests to request a temporary storage area for "large data" sets.
My (hypotechical) use-case would be anything using very large datasets
that you don't want to stu
5 matches
Mail list logo
