Control: tag -1 - wontfix
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Control: retitle -1 Make running bacula-fd as non-root easier
While the default will not be to run as non-root, it will likely become
a debconf question, and so could be preseeded.
And to correct my earlier statement - it is possible to
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:39:52 -0700, Teodor MICU wrote:
The other Bacula services are started by 'bacula' user. Only bacula-fd
is started as 'root'. However, I've just discovered that it can
function properly with limited privileges too.
I'm guessing you aren't doing full system backups?
В Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:19:13 +0200
Teodor MICU mteo...@gmail.com пишет:
2013/1/29 Alexander Golovko alexan...@ankalagon.ru:
ARGS=-u bacula -g bacula -k
I think that from a security perspective this should be the default
on package installation.
This will lead to impossibility to
2013/1/31 Alexander Golovko alexan...@ankalagon.ru:
You lose files owner/group and acl on restoring.
That's not a big deal comparing with the increased security.
/e/d/bacula-{dir,sd} has nonempty ARGS and bacula-{director,sd} will be
incorrectly runned under root privileges if defaults file
2013/1/29 Alexander Golovko alexan...@ankalagon.ru:
ARGS=-u bacula -g bacula -k
I think that from a security perspective this should be the default
on package installation.
This will lead to impossibility to restore backups without
restarting bacula-fd. This is also can require changing
Severity: wishlist
--
В Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:39:52 -0700
Teodor mteo...@gmail.com пишет:
Package: bacula-fd
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
Hi!
The other Bacula services are started by 'bacula' user. Only bacula-fd
is started as 'root'. However, I've just discovered that it
Package: bacula-fd
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-7
Severity: normal
Hi,
The other Bacula services are started by 'bacula' user. Only bacula-fd
is started as 'root'. However, I've just discovered that it can function
properly with limited privileges too.
For this one must edit /etc/default/bacula-df to
7 matches
Mail list logo
