On 2013-05-08 21:39, Michael Vogt wrote:
>> I'm attaching a patch that just skips regative scores from rdeps. I
>> thought I sent this long ago ...
>> It has gotten a lot of testing for doing piuparts squeeze->wheezy
>> upgrades with apt/wheezy+patch (backported to squeeze). Compared to
>> apt/whee
On 2013-05-09 18:43, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> In general, I wonder a bit why we are not just +2 all priority scores and
> have therefore always positive (unsigned) numbers.
I tried this when I looked into this priority issue ... I think I even
added 3 s.t. there would be no (interesting) packag
On 2013-05-09 17:10, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> I'd like to see if this issue could be solved in an early point release
>> for wheezy, too, to have a more sane scoring at work for wheezy->jessie
>> upgrades.
>
> This would obvi
In general, I wonder a bit why we are not just +2 all priority scores and
have therefore always positive (unsigned) numbers.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> This would obviously only work for people having the point release
> installed. As far as I am aware, updates
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #699759
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a patch that just skips regative scores from rdeps. I
> thought I sent this long ago ...
> It has gotten a lot of testing for doing piuparts squeeze->whe
On 2013-05-08 21:39, Michael Vogt wrote:
> I merged this into the recent unstable upload and its also available
> in the debian-wheezy branch. Should I do a proposed-updates upload
> with this fix right away or shall we wait a little bit to see how well
> the change works in unstable first?
Thanks
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #699759
> Control: tag -1 patch
Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
> I'm attaching a patch that just skips regative scores from rdeps. I
> thought I sent this long ago ...
> It has gotten a lot of testin
Followup-For: Bug #699759
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
I'm attaching a patch that just skips regative scores from rdeps. I
thought I sent this long ago ...
It has gotten a lot of testing for doing piuparts squeeze->wheezy
upgrades with apt/wheezy+patch (backported to squeeze). Compared to
apt/wheezy
On 2013-02-04 18:58, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Suggestions for alternative propagation functions:
> // ignore negatives, they already contributed
> // PrioDepends/PrioRecommends to our score
> Score += max(0, RDepScore)
So far I have made a few experiments with this solution and I can
confi
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 18:58:40 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.9.7.7
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> there is a problem in apt's score computation (algorithms.cc,
> MakeScores()) w.r.t. to the negative scores for "optional" and "extra"
Package: apt
Version: 0.9.7.7
Severity: serious
Hi,
there is a problem in apt's score computation (algorithms.cc,
MakeScores()) w.r.t. to the negative scores for "optional" and "extra"
packages. Adding abs(negative score) to some package may give in
incorrect boost to that package.
Setting sever
11 matches
Mail list logo
