Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2014-01-03 Thread Sergio Oller
Here is an updated status of the bug: There is a git repository in [1] with festival-doc. I have added myself as a maintainer, and I will maintain both festival-doc and speech-tools-doc until they are merged into festival and speech-tools (which I help maintaining as part of the Text To Speech

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-08-03 Thread Sergio Oller
I will try to push this bug forward: festival-doc source package builds two packages: festival-doc and speech-tools-doc. Once we have a build system working for both packages, I suggest Jean-Philippe intends to adopt festival-doc source package (or the TTS team adopts it, I don't know :-) ).

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-05-30 Thread Peter Drysdale
In light of my desire to retire from the list of festival and speech-tools uploaders I shall not be able to act on this bug. best regards, Peter Drysdale On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Peter Drysdale drysdalep...@gmail.comwrote: In light of discussions with Ryan Kavanagh any solution to

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-05-28 Thread Peter Drysdale
In light of discussions with Ryan Kavanagh any solution to building festival-doc from the main festival source package should not use texi2html but it replacement. This mail is a noteholder in the bug log for festival-doc orphan bug. I would like to thank Ryan for his contribution to

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-12 Thread Peter Drysdale
Dear All, Sergio's feedback inspired me to push forward in looking at the implementation scenarios for building the doc binary packages from our source package. Our existing texinfo build dependency should make it easy enough to push out any of:- info, HTML or pdf formats. I am happy to do a

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-12 Thread Samuel Thibault
Peter Drysdale, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 00:35:18 +1100, a écrit : Sergio's feedback inspired me to push forward in looking at the implementation scenarios for building the doc binary packages from our source package. Our existing texinfo build dependency should make it easy enough to push out any

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-11 Thread Sergio Oller
Dear all, I will try to give my two cents, although I'm not an a11y expert :-) 2013/2/10 Peter Drysdale drysdalep...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer/Uploaders of festival and Users of festival-docs, To clarify the situation. festival-doc currently contains a html and ps (Postscript) version of

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-09 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
On Saturday 09 Feb 2013 à 17:12:04 (+1100), Peter Drysdale wrote: Dear Users of Festival-doc, Hi, Yes, I still exist! :) I follow your threads. Sorry to be quiet but life is strange in various aspects, including computing. And as I see some very technical and efficient debates take place

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
I completely agree with Jean-Philippe :) Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-09 Thread Peter Drysdale
Dear Maintainer/Uploaders of festival and Users of festival-docs, To clarify the situation. festival-doc currently contains a html and ps (Postscript) version of the Festival Manual. The version number is 1.4.2 and dates from 25th July 2001. CMU (the current employer of Prof. Alan Black - one of

Bug#699950: Festival-doc was orphaned by Kartik - should this be removed from the archive at this point?

2013-02-08 Thread Peter Drysdale
Dear Users of Festival-doc, As one of the uploaders for festival and speech-tools I wish to start the discussion about this recently orphaned package. I note that upstream has not updated the documentation since version 1.4 of festival ( we are now up to version 2.1). Is it really appropriate to