I think your problem could be related to IM Modules? What's the version of
ibus-gtk*?
Hi Aron,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Thanks for the acknowledgement, I understand the situation. I've
> reverted the version in Sid to 1.4.2, though the debian version is
> something odd (to avoid epoch).
I have now updated to ibus 1.5.1.is.1.4.2-1 and generally al
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:46:07PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> > > - separate IME for different windows is working?
>> > AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug.
>>
>> Ok, may
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Do you think uploading as something like 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2 will work?
>
> Should work I guess, if you really want to avoid epochs.
> Just try with
> dpkg --compare-version 1.5.1-2 lt 1.5.1a.is.1.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:46:07PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> > > - separate IME for different windows is working?
> > AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug.
>
> Ok, maybe I was wrong with my explanation: What about the
> *ac
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Do you think uploading as something like 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2 will work?
Should work I guess, if you really want to avoid epochs.
Just try with
dpkg --compare-version 1.5.1-2 lt 1.5.1a.is.1.4.2-1
?
Norbert
--
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story:
>> https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752
>
> Seen that, it is huge, not sure rever
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I would propose to re-upload 1.4 with a new epoch to unstable, to
> unbreak current sitatuon.
I prefer "Let IBus be IBus".
Debian is not a one-stop shop like some other distros.
I guess we don't have to hide something from the users.
> O
SOrry guys, I guess I have to say good-bye to ibus.
I removed all ibus components, installed fcitx, and now, out of nothing,
everything works. Per window setting, Japanese input in firefox/iceweasel,
...
I guess it is time for me to drop ibus.
Norbert
---
Hi,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Here is a relevant commit, though I'm not sure this is the whole story:
> https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/53d33ec4e6ad41a116f25cfa7ce12e04f6f93752
Seen that, it is huge, not sure reverting it would help.
There are too many code changes there. I have t
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> The option has been hidden in ibus-setup, but I'm worry that whether
> ibus 1.5 itself has removed the capability.
I believe that it is removed since changing dconf key has no effect either.
For IBus (1.4.99+) + GNOME combo, it really depend on w
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Ma,
>
> thanks for your email, good research, horrible reading
> (GNome devs are *sick*, removing features without understanding
> their imprtance)
>
> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Pr
Hi Ma,
thanks for your email, good research, horrible reading
(GNome devs are *sick*, removing features without understanding
their imprtance)
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Is this really gone? (BTW, even if they remove it, I
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Is this really gone? (BTW, even if they remove it, I would consider
> it a bug that should be reintroduced upstream )
Yes.
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/issues/detail?id=1568
But GNOME blog says such feature is reintroduced in GNOME 3.7.
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> > - separate IME for different windows is working?
>
> AFAIK this feature is removed, but not simply caused by bug.
Ok, maybe I was wrong with my explanation: What about the
*activation*status*
of the IME? Before I had the option to have some windows w
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Ma,
>
> On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>> FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
>> (with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
>
> - separate IME for different windows is working?
AFAIK t
Hi Ma,
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
> (with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
- separate IME for different windows is working?
- did you try gnome3 (gnome-shell)?
Norbert
--
Hi, all.
FYI, manually compiled IBus 1.5.0 works fine on my Ubuntu 12.10 box
(with MATE as DE); I have used that box for many days.
For errors like "ERROR:root:Could not find any typelib for IBus"
Have you installed GI stuff properly?
Have you got "gir1.2-ibus-1.0" installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> one more bug I found ... iceweasel/firefox ignores the current ibus plugin.
> It works in sakura/gnome-term etc, but not in iceweasel.
>
Thanks for catching the issue.
> It really seems that this ibus 1.5 was no
Hi Aron,
one more bug I found ... iceweasel/firefox ignores the current ibus plugin.
It works in sakura/gnome-term etc, but not in iceweasel.
It really seems that this ibus 1.5 was not tested *at*all*???
Norbert
PREINING,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:32:28AM +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
>
> It depends on the behavior of python-gobject 3.4.x in experimental.
>
> A workaround is to use the patch by Fedora guys:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854161
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=61168
2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
> Hi Norbert,
>
> Can you please try to run "dconf update" as root? As to see whether a
> file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created.
After running "dconf update" I got a new kind of crash:
$ ibus-setup
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/ibus/setup/main.py", l
This will happen when ibus-daemon is running while ibus-dconf not.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>>> > But there are still three problems I see:
>>> > - when *left*clicking on the i
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> > But there are still three problems I see:
>> > - when *left*clicking on the icon in the gnome top bar, a window pops up
>> > which has two part:
>> > upper part: configuration for the input
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> It might be an issue for the release if any of the reverse dependencies
>> need an update for some other reason, given that the new ibus upload
>> changes SONAME..,
>
> Ok, conceeded. Indeed in
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It might be an issue for the release if any of the reverse dependencies
> need an update for some other reason, given that the new ibus upload
> changes SONAME..,
Ok, conceeded. Indeed in this case upload to experimental would have been
better.
Norbert
2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
> Do you have gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed? This time the error should be
> related to locale, IMHO.
yes, I have it installed. I installed the version I built from git,
but I get the same error.
--
പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില്
You have to keep reminding your government that you d
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 04:01 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
> > freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
>
> Breaking sid has no connection to freeze and release, if the
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
> freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
Breaking sid has no connection to freeze and release, if the maintainer
do not plan to ask for a freeze exception.
Don't go over
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Praveen A wrote:
> 2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
>> You forgot to tell me what's your locale - the one that doesn't work, ;-)
>
> My locale is ml_IN (it was in the log - ValueError: unknown locale: ml_IN).
>
> Now it is failing even with en_IN
>
> $ LANG=en_IN ibus-setup
> Tra
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> > But there are still three problems I see:
> > - when *left*clicking on the icon in the gnome top bar, a window pops up
> > which has two part:
> > upper part: configuration for the input method
> > lower part: list of input methods
> > now
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 00:42:29 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Thanks for the report, I was on train when I first saw the report,
> I'll deal with it very soon.
>
Why was that thing uploaded to sid anyway... We're in the middle of a
freeze, breaking sid is not particularly helpful...
Cheers,
Julien
2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
> You forgot to tell me what's your locale - the one that doesn't work, ;-)
My locale is ml_IN (it was in the log - ValueError: unknown locale: ml_IN).
Now it is failing even with en_IN
$ LANG=en_IN ibus-setup
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/ibus/setup/ma
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Praveen A wrote:
> 2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
>> Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far.
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/ibus.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/correct-type-of-shortcuts.patch;h=57da4f5342ecea88c653d0b08f6ec57
2013/2/9 Aron Xu :
> Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far.
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ime/ibus.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/correct-type-of-shortcuts.patch;h=57da4f5342ecea88c653d0b08f6ec5788478f358;hb=HEAD
I did a rebuild and ibus-setup doesn
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far.
>
> getting better. I have now:
> - ibus* 1.5.1-2~1
> (your version -2 from git)
> - mozc* 1.6.1187.102-1~exp2
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Yes, I pushed another patch to git, can you try it? I see no problem so far.
getting better. I have now:
- ibus* 1.5.1-2~1
(your version -2 from git)
- mozc* 1.6.1187.102-1~exp2.1
(experimental version rebuild with ibus1.5)
ibus-setup is now work
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Norbert Preining wrote:
> /etc/dconf/db/ibus
> /etc/dconf/db/ibus.d/00-upstream-settings
And on purge of ibus and friends, I see:
dpkg: warning: while removing ibus, directory '/etc/dconf/db' not empty so not
removed
because /etc/dconf/db/ibus is still present
No
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> Can you please try to run "dconf update" as root? As to see whether a
>> file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created.
>
> Yes, I have now
> /etc/dconf/db/ibus
> /etc/dconf/db/
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Can you please try to run "dconf update" as root? As to see whether a
> file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created.
Yes, I have now
/etc/dconf/db/ibus
/etc/dconf/db/ibus.d/00-upstream-settings
but ibus-setup still crashes:
[~] ibus-set
Hi Norbert,
Can you please try to run "dconf update" as root? As to see whether a
file named /etc/dconf/db/ibus get created.
Thank you.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Hi Aron,
>>
>> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
>> The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
>> ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
>> version very soon.
>
> I just saw in the git rep
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
> ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
> version very soon.
I just saw in the git repo:
ibus (1.5.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
_ i
Hi Aron,
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> Thanks for the follow up! I'm looking for the possibility of automate
> update to 1.5, and it seems to be OK. I'll write the migration howto
> if that's not possible.
Great, thanks
> Be a bit more patient, :-) I've started working on ibus-anthy alrea
Hi Aron,
thanks for your message.
On Sa, 09 Feb 2013, Aron Xu wrote:
> The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
> ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
> version very soon.
No, I *have* gir1.2-ibus-1.0 installed and it does not work.
It is
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> thanks for taking care for that.
>
> On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> This is somewhat expected complication which I am no expert to explain.
>>
>> Aron,
>>
>> What we need is a wiki.debian.org/ibus page which describe
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> > Package: ibus
>> > Version: 1.5.1-1
>>
>> a similar statement goes for the predecessor versi
Hi,
The problem seems to be a easy one, just install gir1.2-ibus-1.0 and
ibus-setup/ibus-daemon will work without problem. I'll upload new
version very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> You have latest ibus and ibus-table upstream release in unstable now.
>
> I just want to remind you guys that other components of IBus may need
> update also.
> For example latest upstream release of ibus-anthy is 1.5.0 while you
> have 1.2.x som
As I checked the debian/rules file and the errors given, it should be
clear that the IBus itself is not built correctly.
You build flags looks reasonable but they are different from Arch's
and Fedora's.
(Arch and Fedora have been using IBus 1.5 for a while.)
You probably hit some build system quir
You have latest ibus and ibus-table upstream release in unstable now.
I just want to remind you guys that other components of IBus may need
update also.
For example latest upstream release of ibus-anthy is 1.5.0 while you
have 1.2.x something.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..
Thanks for the report, I was on train when I first saw the report,
I'll deal with it very soon.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run ibus from experimen
Hi,
I also ran into the same problems with the update to ibus 1.5.1. The
error in ibus-setup comes from the fact that self.__bus.get_config()
returns None instead of a config object.
This is a simple Python program that reproduces this behavior.
from gi.repository import IBus
b=IBus.Bus()
print
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:41:11PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Same here, but I cannot event switch fro ibus-mozc to ibus-anthy,
> because no activation of ibus works.
I meant: I have all of ibus, scim and fctix installed. One of them
really *should* work, at any given point in time.
Kind
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Norbert Preining wrote:
> I thought about that it looks we need to rebuild mozc* and
After rebuiling mozc with ibus 1.5.1 libs I now get a different
error message when trying to run ibus-setup, which hints in the
right direction:
$ ibus-setup
Traceback (most recent call last):
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > And, what is it? I would like to get my Japanese input running again ;-)
>
> dunno, but I have a bunch of input method systems (ibus + some)
> installed simulanously, just in case one breaks down. In such a case, I
> can simply activate another (hopefull
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:24:59PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> And, what is it? I would like to get my Japanese input running again ;-)
dunno, but I have a bunch of input method systems (ibus + some)
installed simulanously, just in case one breaks down. In such a case, I
can simply acti
Dear all,
thanks for taking care for that.
On Fr, 08 Feb 2013, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This is somewhat expected complication which I am no expert to explain.
>
> Aron,
>
> What we need is a wiki.debian.org/ibus page which describes post-1.5
> migration howto. I am sure you have already done some.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Package: ibus
> > Version: 1.5.1-1
>
> a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
> 1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:40:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Package: ibus
> Version: 1.5.1-1
a similar statement goes for the predecessor version,
1.4.99.20120917-3. I get that same import error, too.
I really hoped that 1.5.1 would fix, not exacerbate or continue,
the situation.
I
Package: ibus
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I am trying to run ibus from experimental, but it does not work
at all anymore. Ctrl-Space does not activate anything,
LEFT clicking on the GNOME kbd indicator in the top bar does only
show a small grey rec
61 matches
Mail list logo
