Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-03-01 Thread Anton Gladky
On 03/01/2013 07:40 AM, Marco Balmer wrote: Dear Anton, I've created the tarball with the following command: $ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 ../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2 I have simply downloaded a tar.gz from tags-page [1] Do I need to request a RFS

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-02-28 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marco, I have uploaded the package. But I used the tar.gz-tarball, which is available on github, instead of tar.bz2. Did you repack it yourself? Thanks, Anton signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-02-28 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear Anton, I've created the tarball with the following command: $ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 ../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2 Do I need to request a RFS again after freeze time or will fadecut migrated from experimental to unstable? Thanks, Marco 2013/2/28

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-02-28 Thread Marco Balmer
Dear Anton, Thanks a lot for your useful notes. I've applied all of these and uploaded the package again to mentors. I am glad, if you can have a look again into the package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fadecut

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-02-27 Thread Marco Balmer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fadecut * Package name: fadecut Version: 0.1.2-1 Upstream Author: Marco Balmer * URL: https://github.com/micressor/fadecut * License: GPL-3 Section: sound It builds those binary

Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1

2013-02-27 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Marco, some notes on your package: 1) Target an upload to experimental instead of unstable due to a freeze-period. 2) Changelog-entry #2, add short bug description. 3) Consider to use compat-level 9. 4) Update Format-field in copyright-file, DEP-5 is released. 5) dirs-file is useless. 6) Bart