Hi Michael,
Michael Tautschnig wrote in 2013:
> While building the package using our research compiler
> infrastructure we noticed the following conflicting declarations of
> variables alfa, beta and gama (sic!):
[…]
> The difference in signedness and size (on architectures with
>
Package: bb
Version: 1.3rc1-8.1
Usertags: goto-cc
While building the package using our research compiler infrastructure we noticed
the following conflicting declarations of variables alfa, beta and gama (sic!):
(with tex.c: typedef unsigned long dword;)
./tex.c:64:dword alfa, beta, gama;
2 matches
Mail list logo