tag 703022 pending
thanks
Le Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:38:56AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
I will commit this as a non-normative solution in the absence of comments in
the next few days.
Comitted, thanks to everobody for your contribution.
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
Le Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
It should work way better than before, in part thanks the to the usage
and bug reporting from MIT, but as you say there's still some wrinkles,
which I plan on fixing for 1.17.x;
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
In the meantime, I propose to modify Appendix G by adding the following
sentence.
Do not attempt to divert a conffile, as progdpkg/prog does not handle
it well.
I know that we should not add contents to the appendices, but in that
case it
Le Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:22:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
In the meantime, I propose to modify Appendix G by adding the following
sentence.
Do not attempt to divert a conffile, as progdpkg/prog does not
handle
it well.
I
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
It should work way better than before, in part thanks the to the usage
and bug reporting from MIT, but as you say there's still some wrinkles,
which I plan on fixing for 1.17.x; in any case I'm always interested in
any bug reports affecting these.
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: minor
The example provided in Appendix G of the DPM regarding the removal of
diversions doesn't work if the file diverted is a conffile. This is
due to the fact that conffiles are not removed during a remove, but
but only during a purge. As a
Torsten Jerzembeck t...@nightingale.ms.sub.org writes:
The example provided in Appendix G of the DPM regarding the removal of
diversions doesn't work if the file diverted is a conffile. This is
due to the fact that conffiles are not removed during a remove, but
but only during a purge. As a
On 14.03.2013 17:34, Russ Allbery wrote:
The last time I looked at this (which was several years ago),
diverting
conffiles had enough problems that it was tempting to just say that
it
didn't work reliably. I wonder if we should explicitly recommend
against
diverting conffiles, or if some of
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 10:34:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Torsten Jerzembeck t...@nightingale.ms.sub.org writes:
The example provided in Appendix G of the DPM regarding the removal of
diversions doesn't work if the file diverted is a conffile. This is
due to the fact that conffiles are not
Russ Allbery wrote:
The last time I looked at this (which was several years ago), diverting
conffiles had enough problems that it was tempting to just say that it
didn't work reliably. I wonder if we should explicitly recommend against
diverting conffiles, or if some of those problems have been
10 matches
Mail list logo
