Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

Hi Mònica, Bittwist already exists in stable and old-stable. It will need an ITP??? Can you sponsor for me??? Thanks a lot in advance. Eriberto - Brazil 2013/4/13 Mònica Ramírez mon...@debian.org According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug. Please, could you file it?

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

Sorry... 's/It will need/Will it need/'. 2013/4/13 Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br Hi Mònica, Bittwist already exists in stable and old-stable. It will need an ITP??? Can you sponsor for me??? Thanks a lot in advance. Eriberto - Brazil 2013/4/13 Mònica Ramírez mon...@debian.org

Bug#705257: ITP missing for package bittwist with RFS 705257

Thanks Mònica and Bart. The package already fixed and refreshed in mentors.debian.net. URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bittwist/bittwist_2.0-1.dsc I need a sponsor now. Thanks a lot in advance! Eriberto - Brazil 2013/4/13 Bart Martens ba...@debian.org In my opinion, yes.